<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clientcide (Formerly CNET's Clientside) &#187; Prototype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clientcide.com/category/3rd-party-libraries/prototype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clientcide.com</link>
	<description>Making stuff work on the other side of the request.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:03:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Comparing Prototype to jQuery</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/comparing-prototype-to-jquery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/comparing-prototype-to-jquery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd Party Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Nolen just posted this to the MooTools Google group:
Well thought out blog post about why Prototype is preferred over jQuery.  Not a mindless flame war piece, but a reasoned argument.  Interestingly enough, MooTools actually _combines_ what he likes about Prototype and jQuery into one package! In particular, MooTools has a uniform design [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/comparing-prototype-to-jquery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MooTools followup</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/mootools-followup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/mootools-followup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd Party Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET JS Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MooTools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scriptactulous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moo.fx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I posted yesterday in my flurry of catch-up posts about the mad4milk.net guys new framework: MooTools. I&#8217;ve had a little time to dig into it and I must say that I&#8217;m blown away. In many ways, this is the framework that I&#8217;d say CNET should write for itself if it were to take on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/mootools-followup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Prototype updates, documentation in the works (finally)</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/industry-news/more-prototype-updates-documentation-in-the-works-finally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/industry-news/more-prototype-updates-documentation-in-the-works-finally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA['Industry' News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justin Palmer is shedding more light on Prototype updates.
This time around he covers events and DOM traversal:
Events
In days past bind was great at accepting additional arguments, however, bindAsEventListener didn&#8217;t get this love until now. We can pass those additional arguments to bindAsEventListener with ease:


var Clicker = Class.create();
Clicker.prototype = {
initialize: function(link) {
Event.observe(link, &#8216;click&#8217;, this.onClick.bindAsEventListener(this, &#8216;red&#8217;));
},onClick: function(event, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/industry-news/more-prototype-updates-documentation-in-the-works-finally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prototype Carousel Widget</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/visual-effects/prototype-carousel-widget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/visual-effects/prototype-carousel-widget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Examples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that Bill Scott&#8217;s carousel widget (written with the Yahoo UI Library) is already in play here on CNET Redball (News.com is using it). Here&#8217;s a Prototype version that seems to be a lot smaller &#8211; you&#8217;ll need Prototype (you might be able to get away with the lite version @ 8K, otherwise, 33K), [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/visual-effects/prototype-carousel-widget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prototype changes today</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/industry-news/prototype-changes-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/industry-news/prototype-changes-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA['Industry' News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always get a sinking feeling when Prototype starts to change. Sam (who maintains the project) is checking fixes for the next release today and Justin Palmer (encytemedia.com) is posting things that he&#8217;s seeing get checked in as it happens. On the one hand, the next version offers some nice improvements (thus far, there may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/industry-news/prototype-changes-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prototype: Inheratence Madness</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/best-practices/prototype-inheratence-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/best-practices/prototype-inheratence-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Examples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just found this Encytemedia post on Prototype inheratance that&#8217;s totally worth the read. Additionally, at the end he (Justin Palmer) points to Dean Edward&#8217;s Base script that provides an interesting alternative.
&#8230;All that has since changed.  Thanks to the persuasion of The Javascript MacGyver, Sam replaced the Object.prototype bits in favor of Object.extend and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/best-practices/prototype-inheratence-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prototype Extension: Dynamic Script Pattern Support</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/best-practices/organizing-code/prototype-extension-dynamic-script-pattern-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/best-practices/organizing-code/prototype-extension-dynamic-script-pattern-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Examples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizing Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server-side Integration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, what was I just saying?
via Ajaxian:
Cody Swann was working on a web application that was using the Dynamic Script Pattern, which Dojo has excellent support for, but Prototype didn&#8217;t.
Cody then extended Prototype to support ScriptSrcTransport similarly to how Dojo does it.
The code below support the Simple, Polling and JSONP and JSON Callbacks described in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/best-practices/organizing-code/prototype-extension-dynamic-script-pattern-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveying open-source AJAX toolkits</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/surveying-open-source-ajax-toolkits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/surveying-open-source-ajax-toolkits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd Party Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Examples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the aspects of having a lot of action going on around a development space that&#8217;s rather new is that you get a lot of people solving problems just like the ones you&#8217;re having. These people release their work and you can make use of them if you like.
So you go download a few, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/surveying-open-source-ajax-toolkits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>event:Selectors &#8211; Behaviour +</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/eventselectors-behaviour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/eventselectors-behaviour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd Party Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event Scripting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizing Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just happened upon event:Selectors. It&#8217;s very similar to Behaviour.js (the author&#8217;s spelling, not mine) in most respects, though its much smaller (72 lines / ~2k) and has some nice added functionality using Prototype shortcuts (Behaviour is stand-alone and duplicates a lot of Prototype stuff and is, therefore, larger).
Basic usage:
var Rules = {
   [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/3rd-party-libraries/eventselectors-behaviour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A DOM Ready Extension for Prototype</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/event-scripting/a-dom-ready-extension-for-prototype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/event-scripting/a-dom-ready-extension-for-prototype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Event Scripting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holy cow this is awesome.
via ajaxian: original post
Dean, John, Matthias and a load of other people were working on a really robust solution to the DOM Ready problem. In case you haven&#8217;t seen Dean&#8217;s post, they did it and it is good shit. If you want to read more of an explanation head over to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/event-scripting/a-dom-ready-extension-for-prototype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

