<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clientside Libraries 1.2 RC2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/</link>
	<description>Making stuff work on the other side of the request.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Testing multiple IEs in the same process &#187; Clientside</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/comment-page-1/#comment-30853</link>
		<dc:creator>Testing multiple IEs in the same process &#187; Clientside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 23:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/#comment-30853</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been doing a lot of testing lately with the impending release of our library for MooTools 1.2, and testing in all the versions of IE is a pain. Well, maybe not anymore: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been doing a lot of testing lately with the impending release of our library for MooTools 1.2, and testing in all the versions of IE is a pain. Well, maybe not anymore: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/comment-page-1/#comment-30753</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/#comment-30753</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s only kind of true. These objects wouldn&#039;t be collected until reload anyway, even if I didn&#039;t store them in an array. I&#039;m assuming that a) these things do not individually take up much memory (probably far less than 1k) and b) you won&#039;t be making more than a few on a given page. Even if you did a hundred I doubt you&#039;d see the memory footprint of the browser grow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s only kind of true. These objects wouldn&#8217;t be collected until reload anyway, even if I didn&#8217;t store them in an array. I&#8217;m assuming that a) these things do not individually take up much memory (probably far less than 1k) and b) you won&#8217;t be making more than a few on a given page. Even if you did a hundred I doubt you&#8217;d see the memory footprint of the browser grow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joscha</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/comment-page-1/#comment-30699</link>
		<dc:creator>Joscha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/#comment-30699</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a minor bug: In the JsonP method, you are maintaining a global array JsonP.requestors, in which you push each request. However, since you never pop them or re-initialize the array, you have got a memory leak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a minor bug: In the JsonP method, you are maintaining a global array JsonP.requestors, in which you push each request. However, since you never pop them or re-initialize the array, you have got a memory leak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autocompleter and Slimbox converted for MooTools 1.2 &#187; Clientside</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/comment-page-1/#comment-29929</link>
		<dc:creator>Autocompleter and Slimbox converted for MooTools 1.2 &#187; Clientside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/#comment-29929</guid>
		<description>[...] Stay tuned for more goodness as we continue our push for our own release of our plugin libraries. At this point the code should be stable enough for you to start to actually use if you want to. As mentioned in our last post, we have specs and unit tests that you can run through in the browsers you support to see if you find any issues. As always, let us know if you find anything that&#8217;s out of whack. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stay tuned for more goodness as we continue our push for our own release of our plugin libraries. At this point the code should be stable enough for you to start to actually use if you want to. As mentioned in our last post, we have specs and unit tests that you can run through in the browsers you support to see if you find any issues. As always, let us know if you find anything that&#8217;s out of whack. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/comment-page-1/#comment-29243</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/clientside-libraries-12-rc2/#comment-29243</guid>
		<description>Aaron, thanks again for maintaining these plugins!  The new tests/specs are great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, thanks again for maintaining these plugins!  The new tests/specs are great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

