<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET Update (svn 181), lots of goodies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/</link>
	<description>Making stuff work on the other side of the request.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/comment-page-1/#comment-26468</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26468</guid>
		<description>@Chaffe, I&#039;ve got our work in a branch in our svn here:

http://cnetjavascript.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1-2/

I&#039;m working on it right now and am about 90% complete with the refactor. I have not tested a single line so far, so it&#039;s not ready for actual release yet. I hope to have a release candidate in the next week or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chaffe, I&#8217;ve got our work in a branch in our svn here:</p>
<p><a href="http://cnetjavascript.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1-2/" rel="nofollow">http://cnetjavascript.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1-2/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on it right now and am about 90% complete with the refactor. I have not tested a single line so far, so it&#8217;s not ready for actual release yet. I hope to have a release candidate in the next week or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/comment-page-1/#comment-26467</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26467</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Thanks for passing this along. I&#039;ve updated the code in SVN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Thanks for passing this along. I&#8217;ve updated the code in SVN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/comment-page-1/#comment-26066</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26066</guid>
		<description>Hi guys, wanted to say I love your work on MooTools stuff and your no-nonsense blog posts. Very helpful!

I thought I&#039;d give a (very) little bit back. 

I came across a bug in your implementation of Digitarald&#039;s Autocompleter.js base class. Specifically, you have a misspelled property on line 327: &quot;this.options.mult&quot; -- which means that the query text is never highlighted on additional searches when forms are multi-value enabled. Just a cosmetic issue, but what the heck.

I have created a patch file for the issue if you&#039;re interested: http://www.isolationism.com/patches/Autocompleter.js.patch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys, wanted to say I love your work on MooTools stuff and your no-nonsense blog posts. Very helpful!</p>
<p>I thought I&#8217;d give a (very) little bit back. </p>
<p>I came across a bug in your implementation of Digitarald&#8217;s Autocompleter.js base class. Specifically, you have a misspelled property on line 327: &#8220;this.options.mult&#8221; &#8212; which means that the query text is never highlighted on additional searches when forms are multi-value enabled. Just a cosmetic issue, but what the heck.</p>
<p>I have created a patch file for the issue if you&#8217;re interested: <a href="http://www.isolationism.com/patches/Autocompleter.js.patch" rel="nofollow">http://www.isolationism.com/patches/Autocompleter.js.patch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaffe Barbar</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/comment-page-1/#comment-26046</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaffe Barbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26046</guid>
		<description>hello Aaron, great work on the 181 build.  I&#039;m trying to run it with mootools 1.2 beta2 (with backward compat.) but I&#039;m having few issues.  any ideas for 1.2 compatibility.  Here is a link to the post I submitted on the moo forums. http://forum.mootools.net/viewtopic.php?id=8133</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Aaron, great work on the 181 build.  I&#8217;m trying to run it with mootools 1.2 beta2 (with backward compat.) but I&#8217;m having few issues.  any ideas for 1.2 compatibility.  Here is a link to the post I submitted on the moo forums. <a href="http://forum.mootools.net/viewtopic.php?id=8133" rel="nofollow">http://forum.mootools.net/viewtopic.php?id=8133</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

