Comments on: Class.Binds for MooTools is Back http://www.clientcide.com/code-releases/classbinds-for-mootols-is-back/ Making stuff work on the other side of the request. Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:16:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Aaron N. http://www.clientcide.com/code-releases/classbinds-for-mootols-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-31859 Aaron N. Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:08:44 +0000 http://www.clientcide.com/?p=743#comment-31859 You can use <i>.pass</i> as you like still, of course. The only thing done for you is the binding. You can use .pass as you like still, of course. The only thing done for you is the binding.

]]> By: Tim Lund http://www.clientcide.com/code-releases/classbinds-for-mootols-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-31856 Tim Lund Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:22:20 +0000 http://www.clientcide.com/?p=743#comment-31856 This is pretty sweet, and will certainly make alot of my code more pretty. I still do have alot of calls which require one time arguments, which I don't like saving to the instanced class.. Please correct me if I missed something here, and you indeed can pass arguments with the calls. This is pretty sweet, and will certainly make alot of my code more pretty. I still do have alot of calls which require one time arguments, which I don’t like saving to the instanced class..

Please correct me if I missed something here, and you indeed can pass arguments with the calls.

]]> By: Aaron N. http://www.clientcide.com/code-releases/classbinds-for-mootols-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-31807 Aaron N. Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:25:51 +0000 http://www.clientcide.com/?p=743#comment-31807 As a side note, I'll point out that having Specs to test this stuff makes development WAAAYYY easier. As a side note, I’ll point out that having Specs to test this stuff makes development WAAAYYY easier.

]]> By: Sean McArthur http://www.clientcide.com/code-releases/classbinds-for-mootols-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-31806 Sean McArthur Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:01:48 +0000 http://www.clientcide.com/?p=743#comment-31806 Awesome. That problem you mention is exactly what I had to work around at first. When I wrote the Privates mutator, and got it all working, I instantiated a couple objects, and realized they were sharing the same privates object. Then realized I had to do all the magic for each instance. Cool to see it helped here. Awesome. That problem you mention is exactly what I had to work around at first. When I wrote the Privates mutator, and got it all working, I instantiated a couple objects, and realized they were sharing the same privates object.

Then realized I had to do all the magic for each instance. Cool to see it helped here.

]]>