<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Really Easy Field Validation with Mootools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/</link>
	<description>Making stuff work on the other side of the request.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:16:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-30188</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-30188</guid>
		<description>Yes. You can download it from our download page at http://clientside.cnet.com/js or from our svn repository.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. You can download it from our download page at <a href="http://clientside.cnet.com/js" rel="nofollow">http://clientside.cnet.com/js</a> or from our svn repository.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webz</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-30077</link>
		<dc:creator>webz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-30077</guid>
		<description>hi, i would like to ask if this is already compatible for v1.2.b2? 
well i just want to try to study it if to see if could create something which need for myself. I do hope you can give me thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, i would like to ask if this is already compatible for v1.2.b2?<br />
well i just want to try to study it if to see if could create something which need for myself. I do hope you can give me thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-26774</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-26774</guid>
		<description>Look in the docs (and look at the source) and see how you can write your own validators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look in the docs (and look at the source) and see how you can write your own validators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-26766</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-26766</guid>
		<description>Great stuff! You definitely saved me a lot of time with this! One question, if I have a day (Sunday) which I need to disable, how could I go about doing this?

Thanks so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff! You definitely saved me a lot of time with this! One question, if I have a day (Sunday) which I need to disable, how could I go about doing this?</p>
<p>Thanks so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-19985</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-19985</guid>
		<description>I was just about to roll up my sleeves and do the same thing (convert Dexagogo&#039;s stuff to Mootools) but you just saved me a ton of work good sir!  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just about to roll up my sleeves and do the same thing (convert Dexagogo&#8217;s stuff to Mootools) but you just saved me a ton of work good sir!  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-8154</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-8154</guid>
		<description>I updated this page; this version of the script is deprecated. See:

http://clientside.cnet.com/wiki/cnet-libraries/03-jswidgets#validator.js</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I updated this page; this version of the script is deprecated. See:</p>
<p><a href="http://clientside.cnet.com/wiki/cnet-libraries/03-jswidgets#validator.js" rel="nofollow">http://clientside.cnet.com/wiki/cnet-libraries/03-jswidgets#validator.js</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oli</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-8142</link>
		<dc:creator>Oli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-8142</guid>
		<description>I am still getting a few errors on your demo page and my own page testing out the toggle hyperlink and the radio buttons. This is using IE7 though...

Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still getting a few errors on your demo page and my own page testing out the toggle hyperlink and the radio buttons. This is using IE7 though&#8230;</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My version of easy form validation &#187; Clientside</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-3655</link>
		<dc:creator>My version of easy form validation &#187; Clientside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-3655</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Really Easy Field Validation with Mootools [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Really Easy Field Validation with Mootools [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>I left a console.log statement in there; you&#039;ll need to remove that (I&#039;ll do it myself tomorrow).

I didn&#039;t write this library, just translated it. Valerio and I were already talking about writing something a little more flexible and a little less bulky. Feel free to change it however you like, or wait until we have something else to play with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left a console.log statement in there; you&#8217;ll need to remove that (I&#8217;ll do it myself tomorrow).</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t write this library, just translated it. Valerio and I were already talking about writing something a little more flexible and a little less bulky. Feel free to change it however you like, or wait until we have something else to play with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/comment-page-1/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/code-snippets/really-easy-field-validation-with-mootools/#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Cool. The demo isn&#039;t working for me though (using Firefox 2.0.0.1, but I imagine you already tested with that so I&#039;m not sure what&#039;s up). BTW, most all of the validation regexes can be improved and/or shortened somewhat. I can try to work on this later if you&#039;re interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. The demo isn&#8217;t working for me though (using Firefox 2.0.0.1, but I imagine you already tested with that so I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s up). BTW, most all of the validation regexes can be improved and/or shortened somewhat. I can try to work on this later if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
