<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firebug 1.4 Alpha &#8211; Worth It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/</link>
	<description>Making stuff work on the other side of the request.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AlfonsoML</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32249</link>
		<dc:creator>AlfonsoML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=917#comment-32249</guid>
		<description>The title of the post is misleading, as someone might think that the 1.4alpha is good, but the reality as explained in the rest of the post and the comments is that Firebug has been going down, they try to appeal more regular users, but if we could use previous versions with the current Firefox then I guess that nobody would be using 1.3 and even 1.4 acts too weirdly. 
This might sound heretic, but sometimes I find the IE Developer tools more useful that the current state of Firebug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of the post is misleading, as someone might think that the 1.4alpha is good, but the reality as explained in the rest of the post and the comments is that Firebug has been going down, they try to appeal more regular users, but if we could use previous versions with the current Firefox then I guess that nobody would be using 1.3 and even 1.4 acts too weirdly.<br />
This might sound heretic, but sometimes I find the IE Developer tools more useful that the current state of Firebug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spi</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32246</link>
		<dc:creator>Spi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=917#comment-32246</guid>
		<description>Ok. It&#039;s right that with the 1.3 version, I have some strange errors in the console and that I have sometimes to clean it and restart my tests. And I remember one other thing, in script mode, sometimes you only have some few lines that are shown and you have to scroll for a global refresh ... when you can scroll (even for big files, the scrollbar is not always show).
I&#039;ve never made the relation between the migration and the apparition of these problems.

You&#039;ve opened my eyes ;)

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. It&#8217;s right that with the 1.3 version, I have some strange errors in the console and that I have sometimes to clean it and restart my tests. And I remember one other thing, in script mode, sometimes you only have some few lines that are shown and you have to scroll for a global refresh &#8230; when you can scroll (even for big files, the scrollbar is not always show).<br />
I&#8217;ve never made the relation between the migration and the apparition of these problems.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve opened my eyes ;)</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan J Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32240</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan J Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=917#comment-32240</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally with Valerio on this on. As long as FF2 is on the list of browsers I have to support it will be my default development/debugging browser. Firebug 1.2 was too stable to give up while Firebug 1.3 just makes me furious. When 1.4 is released I&#039;ll check out the stability of it, but for now I need a debugging tool I can trust more than I need the bleeding edge version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally with Valerio on this on. As long as FF2 is on the list of browsers I have to support it will be my default development/debugging browser. Firebug 1.2 was too stable to give up while Firebug 1.3 just makes me furious. When 1.4 is released I&#8217;ll check out the stability of it, but for now I need a debugging tool I can trust more than I need the bleeding edge version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32239</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=917#comment-32239</guid>
		<description>@Spi, it&#039;s not about features really so much as stability and reliability. FB1.3 just isn&#039;t as useful, provides poorer error reporting, reports errors from other tabs, throws its own errors... FB1.2 was rock solid and made my job easier. FB1.3 often has me going to other browsers to see if it&#039;s lying to me or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spi, it&#8217;s not about features really so much as stability and reliability. FB1.3 just isn&#8217;t as useful, provides poorer error reporting, reports errors from other tabs, throws its own errors&#8230; FB1.2 was rock solid and made my job easier. FB1.3 often has me going to other browsers to see if it&#8217;s lying to me or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spi</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32238</link>
		<dc:creator>Spi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=917#comment-32238</guid>
		<description>Hi,

can you develop about the features you find better in Firebug 1.2 (or 1.4 now) than in the 1.3 ? I don&#039;t remember Firebug 1.2 was better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>can you develop about the features you find better in Firebug 1.2 (or 1.4 now) than in the 1.3 ? I don&#8217;t remember Firebug 1.2 was better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32235</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 21:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=917#comment-32235</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Firebug 1.4 is better than 1.3 and it is pretty stable with Firefox 3.5 although lots of stuff is really really broken badly..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Firebug 1.4 is better than 1.3 and it is pretty stable with Firefox 3.5 although lots of stuff is really really broken badly..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerio</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32234</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=917#comment-32234</guid>
		<description>You can never make me stop using Firefox2 + Firebug1 for my daily debugging!
The evolution of Firebug is a great example of how not to screw up your application. Old versions FTW.
Webkit&#039;s inspector is the worse of them all, even worse than the latest firebugs (which are pretty insanely bad).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can never make me stop using Firefox2 + Firebug1 for my daily debugging!<br />
The evolution of Firebug is a great example of how not to screw up your application. Old versions FTW.<br />
Webkit&#8217;s inspector is the worse of them all, even worse than the latest firebugs (which are pretty insanely bad).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Aylott</title>
		<link>http://www.clientcide.com/tools/browser-plugins/firebug-14-alpha-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32233</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Aylott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clientcide.com/?p=917#comment-32233</guid>
		<description>The absolute killer feature of Firebug is CSS line-numbers. Add that to WebKit&#039;s Inspector and Firebug is dead to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The absolute killer feature of Firebug is CSS line-numbers. Add that to WebKit&#8217;s Inspector and Firebug is dead to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
